The Pride of Life

Most preacher nowadays because they are being looked up to be Pastor/Bishop etc and kinda put that person in a high pedestal. They tend to look upon themselves highly to such that they feel like full of integrity and credibility and thought that they cannot make mistake, this happened to Pharisees because they were placed in a high pedestal, they thought that they were right. Actually, those that are in that position are the one prone to deception because the pride of life is there.

The bible said;

“Stop trusting in mere humans, who have but a breath in their nostrils. Why hold them in esteem?” Isaiah 2:22 NIV

“Do not put your trust in princes, in human beings, who cannot save. When their spirit departs, they return to the ground; on that very day their plans come to nothing.” ‭‭Psalm‬ ‭146:3-4‬ ‭NIV‬‬

Whether one was put in high pedestal or not, we are all the same, we all perish. Hence, don’t look up to yourself so high so that, you don’t forget to look down. And, don’t look up any human so high so that, you also can reach what that human had reached.

Click here to read more.

Posted in Jesus Christ | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Title Pastor

The title pastor is a subjective title, meaning, its a title based on personal taste and or opinions.

It’s like the title “father”, It’s personal, you cannot anyhow go on calling anybody a father when you don’t consider the one you are calling a father to you. And, you cannot anyhow give this title to yourself when no one considers you as a father, it is not up to you to claim it but for the sons to give to you and or claim.

My point is, if you are not being pastored by that person then, don’t give him the title when he is not one to you or not pastoring you.

And, those who claim to be pastor, keep it personal, you are a pastor to your followers only, that is the parameter of your pastorship. You should not brag the title pastor, it’s not up to you to even claim it, it is for your followers to claim that you are one, not you, claiming by yourself.

Yes, Christ Himself gave pastors but the bible says, Christ is in us who believes and do His will.

“You, however, are not in the realm of the flesh but are in the realm of the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God lives in you. And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, they do not belong to Christ. But if 👉Christ is in you, then even though your body is subject to death because of sin, the Spirit gives life because of righteousness.”Romans 8:9-10 NIV

So, since Christ is in every believer, it would follow that believers who are sheep in Christ are the one to choose who shall oversee or lead them since Christ is not physically present, which is the function of a pastor or shepherd, not you proclaiming yourself that you will oversee.

“So Christ himself gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, 👉the pastors and teachers,” Ephesians 4:11 NIV

Below are the requirements of the overseer. The requirements i.e. temperate, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, etc. are judged not by yourself but those around you thus, they choose, not you choose yourself. Even if you think that you have the qualifications as below yet nobody or few agree with you, that would be pointless.

“Here is a trustworthy saying: Whoever aspires to be an overseer desires a noble task. Now the overseer is to be above reproach, faithful to his wife, temperate, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not given to drunkenness, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money. He must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him, and he must do so in a manner worthy of full respect. (If anyone does not know how to manage his own family, how can he take care of God’s church?) He must not be a recent convert, or he may become conceited and fall under the same judgment as the devil. He must also have a good reputation with outsiders, so that he will not fall into disgrace and into the devil’s trap.” 1 Timothy 3:1-7 NIV

Posted in Jesus Christ | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Name that the Christ made Known

“Righteous Father, even the 👉world didn’t know you, but I’ve known you, and these believers know that you sent me. 👉I’ve made YOUR NAME known to them 👈and will continue to make it known so that your love for me will be in them, and I myself will be in them.” John 17:25-26 CEB

Just would like to know how anyone will answer the questions below in relation to the above verse.

  1. Assuming the name which Christ made known above means authority, does that mean that before Christ came, the world which includes Jews since they are in the world didn’t really know the Father’s authority thus, the Christ made known it to them? If so, whose authority was it that Israel was following before the Christ came? This question also apply if the name to you means glory or character, it has the same thought.
  2. If the name means character to you, what are the characters of the Father that the Christ made known to them that the world did not know yet before the Christ came?
  3. If the name above that Christ made known is really a name literally, why must Christ still need to make it known since they already knew the name of the Father way back when Moses receive it? Do you not think that it does not make sense for Christ to still made it known when they knew it already?
  4. If the name was theophoric which means, the name of the Son has the name of God in it. It means, they knew all along the name of the Father which would come back to my no. 3 questions?
  5. If it was a name literally, what then is the name of the Father’s made known by Christ that was not known to the world to which, in this name the Father is glorified?
  6. How likely is it that Moses did not really receive the most preferred name of God since the bible is silent on what type of name was given to Moses?
  7. Is it possible that what Moses received was a name that introduces who would come to save mankind? (YHWH was established by most translators of the bible to be THE LORD). THE LORD which is actually a title name forever attached to the name Jesus?

Click the below link to read further:

The Last and one of the Names of the Father made known to Man

The name of the Father was given to the Son

Posted in God’s Name, Father, Jesus | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Last and One of the Names of the Father made known to Man

Question: What was the last and one of the Father’s name made known to man?

Answer: The name given to the Son

Proof:

“I’m no longer in the world, but they are in the world, even as I’m coming to you. Holy Father, watch over them in 👉YOUR NAME, the name you gave me👈, that they will be one just as we are one.” John 17:11 CEB

The name given to the Son in Matt 1:21 was Jesus. This was the excellent name inherited in Heb. 1:4 and the name above all names in Philippians 2:9-10 to which in Act 4:11-12, no other name given for salvation.

Click the link below to read further:

The name of the Father was given to the Son

Posted in Jesus Christ | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

The Pharisee Syndrome in Display- The Debate Conclusion

I believe I have strongly delivered my points through my presentation, my cross-examination, my answer to his cross-examination and to my rebuttals on why God’s mandate on 10% cannot be done in today’s time specifically in church governance, if it is being done in today’s time, that is not the God’s mandate in regards to 10% rather, a counterfeit tithe cleverly designed by men to rob people of their money without them being aware to a point that they will even defend it. I would even say, the cleverest religious scam of all time! See here

Click here on debate links:

What I would like to press on was the attitude he showed in the debate.

Let me recap what actually happened.

First– He challenges me for debate.

Second – He was the one who tagged and picked the moderator who actually has the same stand as him on tithing.

Third– On our first propose debate, he failed to vet the rules of the debate which was draft by the moderator herself before agreeing to it. In the moderator’s rule, it says there that the reference to be used was bible only apparently, his presentation had references that cannot be found in the bible. He eventually conceded for the reason of technicality but actually, it was because he failed to vet the rules of the debate.

Fourth: A rematch was proposed and this time, he composed the topic of the debate and adjusted the rules as according to his preference. Here, I was under the impression that he already vetted the rules of the debate carefully before agreeing to it. The rules were neither made by us but were agreed by both us in the beginning.

Fifth: The debate started, presentations were presented and I started to cross-examine his presentation. He keeps complaining that my questioning was not in the context of his presentation and demanding me to ask a simple question but, the rules did not say that question should be asked in the context of the presentation nor it says to ask a simple and easy question. It only says to ask found in the presentation not necessarily within the context of it. The moderator ruled to follow the stipulated rules which I did.

Sixth: The first violation he commits was during my Q4 when I asked a verse on to WHOM the tithe was commanded to collect. He quoted Matt 23:23 apparently, the verse did not say on to WHOM the Pharisee shall give their tithe. So, the moderator requested him to rephrase his answer but he refuses, telling the audience that he rather take the violation than lose dignity. This was the first sight of Pharisee syndrome which he displayed often during his cross-examination.

A Pharisee syndrome is when a suppose spiritual leader who obtains a degree in theological study finds himself to be always correct especially if the one correcting him may it either by the moderator or his opponent did not study what he had studied in theological school. He feels like he cannot be wrong and should not be corrected by someone academically lower than him in the same manner that Pharisee feels insulted when Jesus who was merely a carpenter corrected them.

Seventh: I also complained about the way he answers as he was explaining things and answering my question that I did not ask but, the moderator ruled against me and said that, I cannot questions the way he answers as long as it answers the question. Moreover, this was seconded by Mr. Carl telling the audience I should not complain and demands for satisfaction to answers. See below

I followed the moderator judgment without argument.

Eighth: My cross-examination was completed noting the moderator judgment as I planned to just do in the rebuttal part. He proceeded to cross-examine my presentation. Here, he complained about my answer in his Q5 and demanded that I rephrased it. The moderator ruled his objection fairly the same on what he told me during my cross-examination which was, should he feel like I did not satisfy his question, he can do it in the rebuttal part. But, he did not accept the moderator ruling. Here, he quarreled with the moderator telling her how she should understand the rules of the debate which she wrote herself and which he accepted in the beginning.

Their argument goes back and forth but blaming me of what happened to a point where he appealed to other Admin regarding Ms. Christine decision.

When the appeal came out through Ms. Christine, his appeal was denied and the decision was still the same – to do it in the rebuttal.

Yet, he still did to accept their verdict. Here, the Pharisee syndrome was on display. He cannot seem to accept that someone who did not obtain theological study as him was denying him, he must feel that the moderator was not seeing what he was seeing because why should she, she did not study what he studied. This was the same manner shown by the Pharisees when they cannot seem to accept that someone lower than them – a mere carpenter was correcting them on what suppose to be their forte

Ninth: This time around he was showing disrespect to the moderator purposely not tagging her and even when he had an objection, he was already directly addressing me seemingly like acting as the moderator telling me that I should do this and that and what rules I violated.

Tenth– Because of his act of being disrespectful to the current moderator which he picks himself and him requesting to change the moderator. The moderator decided to be inactive to give way to the other 2 admin to moderate on his request.

Eleventh– The Moderators he requested to which one of them- Ms. Glomen showed bias early on leaning towards him did not respond and, after repeated attempt for them to cater Mr. Carl request, there was still no response. It was becoming clear that they were not at all interested to moderate. So, rather than the debate not to move forward as it reached an impasse, I decided to post my rebuttals since he does not want to proceed with his questioning as he waits for the new moderator who, actually has no interest to moderate. He was also prideful not to request back again the one who moderated us since the beginning.

Twelfth– Here, where there was no more moderator, he was like freed to accused me that I violate this and that with no other witness but himself.

Thirteenth– He accused me of being afraid to be questioned so, I told him that no one is stopping him to continue his questioning unless he finds my presentation solid that he cannot find questions to examine it. To test this notion, I even asked him to add +5 more questions. Only then, he proceeded with his 8th question. But, every time I answer, since there was no more moderator, he seems to enjoy the free buffet of accusation that I violate this and that as if it was his right to impose a violation. On the other hand, below were his violations which the moderator imposed on him.

The rules that he violated were the following;

As you can see, the violations were about his manner. Ironically, he calls himself a pastor who suppose to teach good manner to people. Yet, he displayed a manner that reflects a Pharisee. At some point, he even selectively accused the moderator of tailoring story, take note he picks the moderator himself not to mention that they have the same stand on tithing. He even called the moderator “Good” in the beginning up to the point where she fairly applied the rules to both of us, at that point, he started to disrespect her.

At one point also, he told me that I failed him in terms of comprehension as if the debate was done for him to be satisfied. It’s like he called me out for debate in a hope that I don’t fail him. This attitude is self centrism or narcissism.

Even name called me and judge me to be stupid, uneducated, did not finish college and high-school.

Perhaps, he resorted to this act for me to lose composure on raising my arguments but I know better as the saying goes;

Thinking is difficult, that’s why most people judge.” – Carl Jung

Overall, based on the way he acts in handling his arguments, it’s clear that he is a disgrace to the title pastor which he attached to himself. This guy is obviously a counterfeit one the same as tithing being taught and practiced by him.

He obviously did not show the fruit of the spirit

“But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,” Galatians‬ ‭5:22‬ ‭NIV‬‬

Thus, if you ever encounter this guy, do not hesitate to confront him about his wrongful belief because in Ephesians 5:11, we ought to expose the work of darkness. You have nothing to worry about especially when he imposes the verse that says “touch not the anointed”, I am pretty sure that he is not one of them so, you can touch the teachings of this guy since he is doing more harm spiritually than good.


Post comment by Carl after posting my conclusion.

This guy really is confirmed narcissistic- having or showing an excessive interest in or admiration of oneself.

His rebuttals are taking so long and conclusion does not require that I rebut again his rebuttals to my answers therefore, it can be done even if his rebuttals are still in progress. Actually, the moment she argued with the moderator and lose her since she chooses to inactive when my opponent disrespected her, at that point, I already have enough information to make my conclusion.


He seems to also have the habit of not being honest. In his rebuttal 7, he denied and push it to me that it was not him who implied that the term “mandate” should not be linked to God when it was him who said the below;

The below is a screenshot of what he said in his rebuttal 7, look how he denied the above.

Posted in Church, God, Tithes | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Act of Observation- Quantum Physics and God

It is said that in quantum mechanics, what forces the particle to behave in certainty is the act of measurement and/or observation. The reality there seems based on whether we open our eyes or not.

There are 2 physics that we know of.

Classical and Quantum physics.

Classical Physics deals with certainty- this is the nature we are familiar with.

While Quantum Physics deals with weird nature that when measure or observed, only then the behavior becomes certain.

Now, why is there 2 nature of reality?

If we factor in God, we will realise that in classical physics, we behave the way we behave because an act of observation by someone higher than the universe has been done already to us so that we now behave in certainty.

Meanwhile, the particles in the Quantum realm that behave not conforming to classical physics are not yet observed and men are learning to harness it hence, we now have electrical devices.

Until now physicists are trying to connect the 2 reality to which they came up with a theory that cannot be proven by experiment. This theory is the string theory, this is commonly depicted in movies like star trek, the one by Jet Li, Marvel universe. This theory suggests that you and me have a duplicate in a parallel universe, this is based when scientists discovered quanton entanglement, the only way to project this to our reality is to have a multiverse with you and me having another version somewhere in the universe that are entangled with us.

As for me, since string theory cannot be proven. When we factor in God, quantum reality will never be projected to our reality because we are already observe hence, we cannot behave like in quantum reality since an act observation has been done to us.

As said in the video, the equation of quantum mechanics helps the engineers to design microscopic switches that direct the flow of tiny electrons and control virtually every one of today’s computer, digital cameras, and telephones.

Engineers are the one who does the act of observation so that these tiny electrons can now behave in certainty to do a specific function i.e to power on the tv, light on the camera, etc.

In a broader perspective, we are like tiny electrons and the engineer is like God. We have been observed and directed in the same manner that tiny electrons are being directed by an engineer to perform a specific function.

In our perspective or, in the perspective of the tiny electron, we have no idea of what lies ahead of us, we cannot foretell our function at the end of the line but, from the perspective of God or Engineer, he already knows our function, our end of the line.


For full video on Quantum mechanics.

Click here

Posted in God, Jesus Christ | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Gen 1:25.5- The Dinosaurs​ Extinction

The Genesis as the book of creation is obviously not a complete book, it only outlines what had happened in the past that is necessary to our faith. I do believe that in between verses, there are gaps that we can analyze so we can place discoveries of men to coincide with genesis not contradict it. One discovery of men that seemingly contradicted with the bible was the dinosaurs. Where do these big creatures and what happened to them fit in the book of Genesis?

Well, I do believe that they were created in the verse below:

“And God made the beast of the earth according to its kind, cattle according to its kind, and everything that creeps on the earth according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.” Genesis 1:25 NKJV

This was day 6 just before the man was created. It has been said that humans did not co-exist with dinosaurs since they will just be prey to these carnivorous creatures.

I also believe that what happened to dinosaurs occur somewhere in between Gen 1:25 and Gen 1:26. Scientists have long theorized that the dinosaurs met their demise at the hands of a giant asteroid but, if we are to be biblical about this, this was due to the war in heaven which I believe happened also in between Gen 1:25 and Gen 1:26, these creatures were simply collateral damage of the war that broke out.

“And war broke out in heaven: Michael and his angels fought with the dragon; and the dragon and his angels fought, but they did not prevail, nor was a place found for them in heaven any longer. So the great dragon was cast out, that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was cast to the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.” Revelation 12:7-9 NKJV

Some say that the above are yet to happen therefore my premise is impossible but, I do agree with Randy Alcorn when he said the below;

Scripture often has an “already and not yet” aspect to it. We are already saved (delivered from penalty of sin), but we are being saved (delivered from power of sin) and will be saved in the future (delivered from the presence of sin).

Similarly, Satan has already been defeated (thrown out of heaven and defeated by Christ’s atonement resurrection), he is being defeated (in a present battle described in Ephesians 6), and he will be defeated in the final battle. So the war in heaven has happened in the past, is happening now, and will happen in the future for the final time. So Rev. 12:7 has past, present and future implications all at once. It appears to me to be primarily a statement of what happened in the past when Satan in the first battle was kicked out of Heaven, but it will happen again in sort of a final battle that will end the war once and for all.  Click here.

Now, let me break down what likely had happened in between Gen 1:25 and Gen 1:26. Take note, the per day of creation did not happen in a literal day as the verse says;

“But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is “like” a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.” 2 Peter 3:8 NIV

1 day to the Lord is LIKE a thousand years. Does it mean that 1 day = 1000 years. The text says ‘one day is like [or as] a thousand years’—the word ‘like’ (or ‘as’) shows that it is a figure of speech, called a simile, to teach that God is outside of time (because He is the Creator of time itself). In fact, the figure of speech is so effective in its intended aim precisely because the day is literal and contrasts so vividly with 1000 years—to the eternal Creator of time, a short period of time and a long period of time may as well be the same. Meaning, a day to the lord may range from day 1 to billion years.

Having said the above, day 6 in itself whereby Genesis 1:25-26 was written happened in a duration ranging from million to even billion years and, what happened to the dinosaurs took place in between these verses.

Going back, after God created dinosaurs in Gen 1:25, Lucifer who took care of these creatures, for some reason, perhaps of jealousy since God was about to create a man in His image convinced 1/3 of the angels (Rev 12:4) to go to war against God. Remember, these were powerful spiritual beings and when the war broke out, the earth shakes, meteors fell down, the volcano erupts causing creatures in Gen 1:25 to be destroyed even causing the continents to be separated.

When the war finally subside and Lucifer along with 1/3 of the angels were thrown to earth, God created a garden in the east of Eden.

“The LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden, and there He put the man whom He had formed.” Genesis‬ ‭2:8‬ ‭NKJV‬‬

“Then the LORD God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to tend and keep it.” Genesis‬ ‭2:15‬ ‭NKJV‬‬

The man was created outside the garden and was only placed inside of it. Since Lucifer and his angels were at this point already roaming around the earth, the garden aside from tending and keeping it, the garden also served as a secured place safe from these fallen angels.

In this garden, God created again those that were destroyed due to the war but this time, the animals were more friendly so that man can now dominate over them even named them one by one.

“And the LORD God said, “ It is not good that man should be alone; I will make him a helper comparable to him.” Out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the air, and brought them to Adam to see what he would call them. And whatever Adam called each living creature, that was its name.” ‭‭Genesis‬ ‭2:18-19‬ ‭NKJV‬‬

Unfortunately, there was one creature who was cunning among all the beast that was used by the fallen angels to deceive the man so that, they can be evicted from the garden to finally be exposed to these fallen angels.

“Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said to the woman, “Has God indeed said, ‘You shall not eat of every tree of the garden’?”‭‭Genesis‬ ‭3:1‬ ‭NKJV‬‬

When Cain said the below;

“Surely You have driven me out this day from the face of the ground; I shall be hidden from Your face; I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond on the earth, and it will happen that anyone who finds me will kill me.”Genesis‬ ‭4:14‬ ‭NKJV‬‬

He was actually referring to these fallen angels. They were the only one capable of killing another being.


Watch below:

Creation in an account of Genesis.

Posted in God | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment